Dear readers –
A friendly reminder to go get a flu shot, if you haven’t gotten one already. I’d been only about a week over my cold/strep throat bonanza this winter when I picked up the flu. What a pain. I highly recommend avoiding the flu in any way possible. Then, if you do get the flu, follow the CDC’s advice and don’t go out at all (not for shopping, not for the doctor, not for work) at least 24 hours after your fever is past. The CDC’s advice is not for the sick person, but rather for the healthy people that the sick person could easily infect on short errands.
That said, I’m home today, recovering from yesterday’s fever, and writing about another group learning from past issues. Remember the “Restore Hetch Hetchy” ballot measure in San Francisco? It basically enabled the City of San Francisco to vote on whether the water supply of the City, the peninsula, and much of the South Bay would be dismantled. The measure was voted down (77% said no!), but the water utilities around the Bay, who are tasked with maintaining supply, have decided not to wait for the Restore Hetch Hetchy folks to rally the City for Round 2. Instead, they passed an amendment to their contract (that is, the San Francisco Public Utility Commission, SFPUC, and the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency, which is made up of the 26 water agencies that purchase Hetch Hetchy water) that requires any modifications to the Hetch Hetchy reservoir to be approved by all 26 agencies.
Now I don’t think that SFPUC and the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency are necessarily against modifying the Hetch Hetchy, but consider that the ballot measure would have allowed the City of San Francisco to dismantle a water supply in which 2/3rds of the customers (who pay for operations and maintenance) had no voice. That seems pretty unfair. The Restore Hetch Hetchy folks of course call this an “end-run around democracy”, but what was the ballot measure in that case?